Information for Parents and Guardians with Students in Public School

on .

Most of California’s Catholic families with school-age children choose to enroll them in the state’s public schools—rather than in Catholic or other private schools. Our public schools, which operate “in loco parentis,” that is “in place of the parent,” are staffed by talented and dedicated educators—many of whom are Catholics committed to the common good.  Ideally, parents and teachers form a partnership to educate and develop good citizens.
CCC Downloads bronze CCC Espanol bronze
Spanish

However, some parents with children in public schools are unfamiliar with the law, what their child will be allowed to do—or asked to do and unaware of certain ideas and information their child will be taught.  This document has been prepared to give basic information about Catholic Church teaching, federal law, California state law, and standard California public school policy and practice.

CATHOLIC TEACHING:  As Catholics, we strongly believe that parents are the first and foremost educators of their children.  The Catholic Catechism states that families are a “privileged community” called to achieve a "sharing of thought and common deliberation...in the children's upbringing” (# 2206)  and that as “those first responsible for the education of their children, parents have the right to choose a school for them which corresponds to their own convictions...Public authorities have the duty of guaranteeing this parental right and of ensuring the concrete conditions for its exercise.” (#2229)

FEDERAL LAW:  Our federal constitution supports the concept that parents have the right to “direct” their children’s education.  In 1925 the U. S. Supreme Court unanimously affirmed in the case Pierce v. Society of Sisters that “the fundamental theory of liberty upon which all governments in this Union repose excludes any general power of the State to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only.” 

CALIFORNIA LAW:  Parents/guardians have the right to oversee their child’s instruction. 

> Specifically, according to the California Education Code (see links below):

§51540:  If any part of a school's instruction in health conflicts with the religious training and beliefs of a parent or guardian of a pupil, the pupil, upon written request of the parent or guardian, shall be excused from the part of the instruction that conflicts with the religious training and beliefs.  For purposes of this section, "religious training and beliefs" includes personal moral convictions.

§51513:  No test, questionnaire, survey, or examination containing any questions about the pupil's personal beliefs or practices in sex, family life, morality, and religion, or any questions about the pupil's parents' or guardians' beliefs and practices in sex, family life, morality, and religion, shall be administered to any pupil in kindergarten or grades 1 to 12, inclusive, unless the parent or guardian of the pupil is notified in writing and ..the parent or guardian of the pupil gives written permission for the pupil to take this test, questionnaire, survey, or examination.

§51938: A parent or guardian of a pupil has the right to excuse their child from all or part of comprehensive sexual health education, HIV/AIDS prevention education, and assessments related to that education.

CALIFORNIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS' STANDARD POLICY AND PRACTICE: Teachers and administrators value the active involvement of parents in the education of their children. However, that involvement must include awareness of the law. At the beginning of each school year, public schools send home many documents containing important information that is often misunderstood or overlooked. Included in the papers is both the notification regarding an “assumed opt-in” for all educational programs and a notification that students in grades 7-12 may be excused for confidential medical services.

>    Assumed Opt-In means if the parents/guardians do not notify school officials then it will be assumed that they approve or “opt-in” to the school’s entire program. Public schools’ programs, topic offerings and procedures for parental involvement may differ from community to community as a reflection of local practices and recent experiences. Each school’s policy regarding “opt-in” and “opt-out” is written and should be available to parents.

>    Instructional Topics from which some parents have chosen to “opt-out.” 

  • Sex or family life education
  • AIDs or HIV education
  • Acquisition and/or use of birth control devices or drugs
  • Showing of R, NC-17 or X-rated films
  • Counseling except as recommended by the student’s physician
  • Questionnaires/role playing examining the moral and religious beliefs of the student and/or the student’s family members
  • Diversity education which does not respect parents’ values

>      Parents/Guardians who object to certain educational topics must specifically request that their children be excused, i.e., they must “opt-out.” All parents or guardians have the right to be informed of the content and approximate date of presentation of all materials and subjects.  They also have the right to examine copies of all tests, questionnaires, or surveys that inquire about students’ or their parents’ personal beliefs, family life, religion or sex practices. The rules regarding “opt-out” follow:

  • In order to make a “specific request” to have their student excluded from a school activity, parents/guardians must complete a standard “opt-out” form which can be obtained from the school office.
  •  A signed “opt-out” form must be submitted for each student and for each type of objectionable activity from which that student is to be excused.
  •  An “opt-out” form is only considered valid for the current school yearand must be resubmitted annually.

> Confidential medical services are available upon request for public school students from the time they enter the 7th grade.  The students may be released in order to secure the services, which may include contraceptives, abortions and/or psychotropic drugs.  There is NO “opt-out” available for this policy. California Education Code 46010.1 states:

“Commencing in the fall of the 1986-87 academic year, the governing board of each school district shall each academic year notify pupils in grades 7-12 inclusive and the parents or guardians of all pupils enrolled in the district, that school authorities may excuse any pupil from the school for the purpose of obtaining confidential medical services without the consent of the pupil’s parent or guardian. The notice required pursuant to this section may be included with any other notice given pursuant to this code.”  (Emphasis added)

In 1997, the California Supreme Court decision (American Academy of Pediatrics v. Lungren) affirmed the “right of privacy” for minors. And in 2004, then Attorney General Lockyer wrote an opinion stating:  “We view this provision [Education code 46010.1] as requiring school districts to notify both students and their parents that students are allowed to be excused from school for confidential medical appointments without parental consent.” (Emphasis added)

Ordinarily, parents or guardians must grant written permission for their children to participate in off campus activities or to receive over-the-counter medication from school personnel. However, when a student requests confidential medical services, then he or she can actually be released without parental knowledge or permission during school hours to receive those services.

MORE INFORMATION: It is important to remember that parents are responsible for partnering with public schools to ensure the quality of education their children receive.  Catholic families need to be aware of the standard practices and policies of California public schools—particularly the standard “opt-in” policy, which means that parents or guardians must assert their right for information and their right to “opt-out ” if they find certain topics objectionable, and the practice of releasing 7-12th grade students for confidential medical services.

It is also important to remember the Church teaches that families are a “privileged  community” called to achieve a "sharing of thought and common  deliberation...in the children's upbringing “and that “public authorities  have the duty of guaranteeing this parental right.”

RESOURCES & LINKS

EDUCATION CODES

California Education Codes, Legislation, Federal and State Court decisions and Attorney General Rulings cited in
Information for Parents and Guardians with Students in Public Schools

Education Code 51240:
(a)   If any part of a school's instruction in health conflicts with the religious training and beliefs of a parent or guardian of a pupil, the pupil, upon written request of the parent or guardian, shall be excused from the part of the instruction that conflicts with the religious training and beliefs.
(b)   For purposes of this section, "religious training and beliefs" includes personal moral convictions.
Education Code 51513:
No test, questionnaire, survey, or examination containing any questions about the pupil's personal beliefs or practices in sex, family life, morality, and religion, or any questions about the pupil's parents' or guardians' beliefs and practices in sex, family life, morality, and religion, shall be administered to any pupil in kindergarten or grades 1 to 12, inclusive, unless the parent or guardian of the pupil is notified in writing that this test, questionnaire, survey, or examination is to be administered and the parent or guardian of the pupil gives written permission for the pupil to take this test, questionnaire, survey, or examination.

 

Education Code 51938:  

A parent or guardian of a pupil has the right to excuse their child from all or part of comprehensive sexual health education, HIV/AIDS prevention education, and assessments related to that education, as follows:

   (a)    At the beginning of each school year, or, for a pupil who enrolls in a school after the beginning of the school year, at the time of that pupil's enrollment, each school district shall notify the parent or guardian of each pupil about instruction in comprehensive sexual health education and HIV/AIDS prevention education and research on pupil health behaviors and risks planned for the coming year.  The notice shall do all of the following:
                    (1) Advise the parent or guardian that written and audiovisual educational materials used in comprehensive sexual health education and HIV/AIDS prevention education are available for inspection.
                    (2) Advise the parent or guardian whether the comprehensive sexual health education or HIV/AIDS prevention education will be taught by school district personnel or by outside consultants.  A school district may provide comprehensive sexual health education or HIV/AIDS prevention education, to be taught by outside consultants, and may hold an assembly to deliver comprehensive sexual health education or HIV/AIDS prevention education by guest speakers, but if it elects to provide comprehensive sexual health education or HIV/AIDS prevention education in either of these manners, the notice shall include the date of the instruction, the name of the organization or affiliation of each guest speaker, and information stating the right of the parent or guardian to request a copy of this section, Section 51933, and Section 51934.  If arrangements for this instruction are made after the beginning of the school year, notice shall be made by mail or another commonly used method of notification, no fewer than 14 days before the instruction is delivered.
                    (3) Include information explaining the parent's or guardian's right to request a copy of this chapter.
                    (4) Advise the parent or guardian that the parent or guardian may request in writing that his or her child not receive comprehensive sexual health education or HIV/AIDS prevention education.
   (b)   Notwithstanding Section 51513, anonymous, voluntary, and confidential research and evaluation tools to measure pupils' health behaviors and risks, including tests, questionnaires, and surveys containing age-appropriate questions about the pupil's attitudes concerning or practices relating to sex may be administered to any pupil in grades 7 to 12, inclusive, if the parent or guardian is notified in writing that this test, questionnaire, or survey is to be administered and the pupil's parent or guardian is given the opportunity to review the test, questionnaire, or survey and to request in writing that his or her child not participate.
   (c)    The use of outside consultants or guest speakers as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) is within the discretion of the school district.
Legislation, Court decisions and Attorney General Rulings

   

§  In 1967, California’s Therapeutic Abortion Act made it legal for a physician to perform an abortion in an accredited hospital when continuation of the pregnancy would “gravely impair the physical or mental health of the mother,” or when the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest. The law banned termination of pregnancy after the 20th week of pregnancy.

 

§  In 1972, the California electorate added an explicit “right of privacy” to the California Constitution.

 

§  In 1973 in Roe v. Wade, the U.S. Supreme Court found a constitutional right of privacy which allowed a woman to obtain an abortion before the viability of her fetus.  In a companion case, Doe v. Bolton, the Court ruled that a pregnant woman could obtain an abortion at anytime if her life or health (including mental health and sense of well being) was at risk. These federal rulings struck down all state abortion bans, and invalidated every provision of California’s abortion law except that a physician must perform the abortion.

 

§  In 1981, the California Supreme Court ruled in Reproductive Rights v. Myers that the ban on funding of abortions was unconstitutional because the restriction (of not being able to afford to pay for an abortion) was “an obstacle” to the exercising of the expressed constitutional right.

 

§  In 1992, the U. S. Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, reaffirmed Roe, but imposed a new standard in determining the validity of laws restricting abortions: State regulation must not have the purpose or effect of imposing an “undue burden,” which is defined as a “substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus attains viability.” Among the state imposed restrictions allowed to stand under federal law were record-keeping, 24 hour waiting period, informed consent of the woman, and in the case of a minor, the consent of one parent (with a judicial bypass).

 

§  In 1997, the California Supreme Court ruled in American Academy of Pediatrics v. Lungren that requiring parental consent for abortion was unconstitutional because a minor’s right to privacy superseded her parents’ rights as guardians.

 

§  In 2002, California made “abortion-on-demand” a right in statute.

 

 

Prepared by the California Catholic Conference Education Committee 
1119 K Street, 2nd Floor w Sacramento, CA 95814
www.cacatholic.org w (916) 313-4000
August 2009

Tags:

Legislative Priorities

  • thumb-200
    Reverence for Life
  • poor young boy
    Human Dignity
  • catholicschoolgirl
    Education
  • showcase-family
    Family Life & Marriage
  • judicial
    Restorative Justice
  • we-the-peoplel
    Religious Liberty