Skip to main content

Proposition 62 – Death Penalty Repeal - CCC SUPPORT

Printer-friendly version

Official Title:   (Click here for related Proposition 66.)

Death Penalty: Initiative Statute

CCC Position



Proposition 62 is an initiative that, if approved by the voters, would repeal the death penalty for persons found guilty of murder and would replace it with life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.  The Bishops of California have agreed to support Proposition 62 and oppose Proposition 66 (which would speed up death penalty appeals).  Additional information is available below.

Since the current death penalty was enacted in California in 1978, over 900 individuals have received a death sentence.  As of October 2015, 15 have been executed, 102 have died prior to being executed, 747 are in state prison with death sentences, and the remainder have had their sentences reduced by the courts.  Most of the offenders who are in prison with death sentences are at various stages of the direct appeal or habeas corpus review process.

Under existing state law, death penalty verdicts are automatically appealed to the California Supreme Court.  In these “direct appeals,” the defendants’ attorneys argue that violations of state law or federal constitutional law took place during the trial, such as evidence improperly being included or excluded from the trial.  If the California Supreme Court confirms the conviction and death sentence, the defendant can ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review the decision.  In addition to direct appeals, death penalty cases ordinarily involve extensive legal challenges in both state and federal courts.  These challenges involve factors of the case different from those considered in direct appeals (such as the claim that the defendant’s counsel was ineffective) and are commonly referred to as “habeas corpus” petitions.  Finally, inmates who have received a sentence of death may also request that the Governor reduce their sentence. Currently, the proceedings that follow a death sentence can take a couple of decades to complete in California.

Proposition 62 would repeal the death penalty for persons found guilty of murder and would replace it with life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.  Proposition 62 would apply retroactively to persons already sentenced to death.

In addition, Proposition 62 would require that persons found guilty of murder and sentenced to life without the possibility of parole must work while in prison and increases to 60 percent the portion of wages earned that may be applied to any victim restitution orders or other orders against the inmate.

Fiscal Impact:

According to the Legislative Analyst Office (LAO), Proposition 62 would reduce net state and local costs associated with murder trials, appellate litigation, and prisons by around $150 million annually within a few years.  This reduction in costs could be higher or lower by tens of millions of dollars, depending on various factors including how the proposition is implemented and the rate of death sentences and executions that would take place in the future in the absence of the measure.

CCC Position:  SUPPORT

Statement of Support from the California Catholic Conference

During this Jubilee Year of Mercy, we, the Catholic Bishops of California support Proposition 62 which would end the use of the death penalty in California.  Our commitment to halt the practice of capital punishment is rooted both in the Catholic faith and our pastoral experience.

All life is sacred – innocent or flawed – just as Jesus Christ taught us and demonstrated repeatedly throughout His ministry.  This focus on the preciousness of human life is fundamental to Christianity and most eloquently expressed in the two great commandments: “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart … love your neighbor as yourself.” (Mk. 12.30-31) Jesus makes clear that to love God we must love our neighbor.  Each of us holds an inherent worth derived from being created in God’s own image.  Each of us has a duty to love this divine image imprinted on every person.  “Whoever does not love a brother whom he has seen cannot love God whom he has not seen.” (I Jn. 4.20)

Our support to end the use of the death penalty is also rooted in our unshakeable resolve to accompany and support all victims of crime.   They suffer the very painful consequences of criminal acts.  With the violent loss of a loved one, a sword has pierced their heart.   Their enduring anguish is not addressed by the state-sanctioned perpetuation of the culture of death.  As we pray with them and mourn with them we must also stress that the current use of the death penalty does not promote healing.  It only brings more violence to a world that has too much violence already.  We will continue to promote responsibility, rehabilitation and restoration for everyone impacted by the criminal justice system.  Only through their healing will the entire community be healed. 

The Bishops of the United States have long opposed the use of capital punishment.  In the past, it was sometimes morally justified in order to protect society, but those times have passed.  Proposition 62 provides voters with the opportunity to end this practice in California, just as 19 other states have already done.

Capital punishment has repeatedly been shown to be severely and irrevocably flawed in its application.  In the long – but absolutely necessary – process of ensuring an innocent person is not put to death, we have seen many accused persons being exonerated as new forms of forensic investigation have enabled us to better scrutinize evidence.  The high cost of implementing the death penalty has diverted resources from more constructive and beneficial programs both for rehabilitation and restoration of victims and offenders.  Finally, repeated research has demonstrated that the death penalty is applied inconsistently along racial, economic and geographical lines.

For all of these reasons, we must also oppose Proposition 66 which will expedite executions in California.  The search for a fair and humane execution process and protocol has failed for decades.  Any rush to streamline that process will inevitably result in the execution of more innocent people.  Neither the proponents nor the opponents of the death penalty wish this result.

As Catholic Bishops we are heartened by the growth of Catholic lay movements aimed at ending the use of the death penalty.  The faithful have heard the words of St. Pope John Paul II, Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI and Pope Francis to stop this practice around the world.  As Pope Francis has stated:

A spreading opposition to the death penalty, even as an instrument of legitimate social defense, has developed in public opinion, and this is a sign of hope. In fact, modern societies have the ability to effectively control crime without definitively taking away a criminal’s chance to redeem himself.  The issue lies in the context of a perspective on a criminal justice system that is ever more conformed to the dignity of man and God’s design for man and for society.  And also a criminal justice system open to the hope of reintegration in society. The commandment “thou shall not kill” has absolute value and pertains to the innocent as well as the guilty. (2/21/16 – Angelus)

In November – the concluding month of the Year of Mercy – Californians have the opportunity to embrace both justice and mercy (cf. Ps. 85.11) in their voting.  We strongly urge all voters to prayerfully consider support for Proposition 62 and opposition to Proposition 66.


Proposition 62 is supported by death penalty activists and organizations, criminal defense lawyer groups, and the California Democratic Party.

Supporters argue that since 1978, California has spent more than $5 billion on a death penalty system that has executed only 13 people.  Even though there are over 700 inmates now on death row, California has not executed anyone in almost eleven years because there are serious problems.

Supporters maintain that the death penalty is an empty promise to victims’ families and carries the unavoidable risk of executing an innocent person.  More than 150 innocent people have been sentenced to death in this country, and some innocent people have actually been executed.

Additionally, by replacing the death penalty with life in prison without the possibility of parole, Proposition 62 would save the state $150 million per year.  Supporters state that these savings can be spent on education, public safety, and crime prevention that actually works. 


Opponents of Proposition 62 include Mike Ramos, District Attorney of San Bernardino County; Marc Klaas, father of 12-year-old murder victim Polly Klaas; and the Peace Officers Research Association of California. 

Opponents contend that for the worst murders like child killers, rape/torture murderers, serial murderers, and police killers, there needs to be a death penalty.  While opponents acknowledge that California’s death penalty system is broken, they believe that the answer is to mend, not end, the state’s death penalty laws. 

Moreover, opponents state that prosecutors, law enforcement, and families of murder victims oppose this measure because it jeopardizes public safety, denies justice and closure to victims’ families, and rewards the most horrible killers.   

Reflections on Church Teaching:

“There is no fitting punishment without hope!  Punishment for its own sake, without room for hope, is a form of torture, not of punishment.”  Pope Francis, Message to 6th World Congress Against the Death Penalty (June 22 2016).

“The dignity of human life must never be taken away, even in the case of someone who has done great evil. Modern society has the means of protecting itself, without definitively denying criminals the chance to reform.”  Saint Pope John Paul II, Evangelium Vitae (1995).

The Catechism of the Catholic Church explains that “the traditional teaching of the Church does not exclude recourse to the death penalty, if this is the only possible way of effectively defending human lives against the unjust aggressor. If, however, non-lethal means are sufficient to defend and protect people's safety from the aggressor, authority will limit itself to such means” (CCC, 2267). The test of whether the death penalty can be used is not the gravity of the offense, but whether it is absolutely necessary to protect society. The Catechism adds that today “the cases in which the execution of the offender is an absolute necessity ‘are very rare, if not practically non­existent’” (CCC, 2267).

In 2005, the Catholic Bishops of the United States issued, A Culture of Life and the Penalty of Death.  In the document the Bishops stated that the gift of life must be respected and protected; “that every life is a precious gift from God" (see Gn 2:7, 21-23) and that we are all created in God’s image and redeemed by Jesus Christ, who himself was crucified.  They acknowledged that sentences such as “life in prison without parole” provide non-lethal alternatives and called for an end to the use of the death penalty in the United States, stating “it is time for our nation to abandon the illusion that we can protect life by taking life.”

"Ending the death penalty would be one important step away from a culture of death and toward building a culture of life." (United States Catholic Bishops, 2005. A Culture of Life and the Penalty of Death)  

Related Sources:

To learn more about Restorative Justice issues in California, visit our website at

California Catholic Conference National Crime Victims Rights Week Statement, April 2016

Responsibility, Rehabilitation, and Restoration: A Catholic Perspective On Crime And Criminal Justice, US Conference of Catholic Bishops, 2000

See also: Proposition 66